# Where is juliac developed

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/where-is-juliac-developed/113004>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** question\
**Created:** [April 16, 2024, 11:27am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/where-is-juliac-developed/113004 "2024-04-16T11:27:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![abraemer](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/abraemer/32/51403_2.png) [@abraemer](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/abraemer)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2024, 7:52am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/where-is-juliac-developed/113004/6 "2024-04-17T07:52:13Z")

</div>

I think the recent wave of `juliac` discussion where triggered by overinterpreting the last sentence of this post

> [@Julia slower than Python for finding pangrams?](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-slower-than-python-for-finding-pangrams/112481/8):
>
> Yeah, but this is ~100% startup/compilation time. It’s kinda like timing: hyperfine --shell=none --warmup 30 "cc pangram.c && ./a.out wjjqevffkkgbcehhiqpvqutmwxawzvjnbvukmlzxyhkgfddzfjhcujnlkjbdfgghjhujkiuytghjioplkjhgfdsaqwertyujioplkjhgfdsaqwertzuioplkjhgfdsazxcvbnmlkjhgfdsaqwertyuioplkjhgfdsazxcvbnmlkjhgfdsaqwertyuioplkjhgfdsaqwertyuioplkjhgfdsazxcvbnmlkjhgfdsaqwertyuioplkjhgfdsaqwertyuioplkjhgfdsazxcvbnmlkjhgfdsaqwertyuioplkjhgfdsaqwertyuioplkjhgfdsazxcvbnmlkjhgfdsaqwertyuioplkjhgfdsaqwert…

Edit: This preview looks very odd if you don’t expand it 😃  
For convenience, the sentence was:

> [@Julia slower than Python for finding pangrams?](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-slower-than-python-for-finding-pangrams/112481/8):
>
> The good news is that we’re getting closer to having a real `juliac` that can output compiled stand-alone executables with significantly lower startup times like `cc` does.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/where-is-juliac-developed/113004)._