# When to use QRSHManager?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/when-to-use-qrshmanager/47154>\
**Category:** Julia at Scale\
**Created:** [September 23, 2020, 8:08pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/when-to-use-qrshmanager/47154 "2020-09-23T20:08:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jzr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/eb9ed0/32.png) [@jzr](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/jzr)\
**Post date:** [September 23, 2020, 8:08pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/when-to-use-qrshmanager/47154/1 "2020-09-23T20:08:22Z")

</div>

@bjarthur mentioned that `QRSHManager` can increase reliability on some systems:

> Julia workers can frequently timeout waiting for the standard output files to appear. In this case, it’s better to use the QRSHManager, which uses SGE’s qrsh command to bypass the filesystem and captures STDOUT directly.

What errors should I expect to see if this is my situation?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bjarthur](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/bjarthur/32/9638_2.png) [@bjarthur](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/bjarthur)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2020, 1:20pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/when-to-use-qrshmanager/47154/2 "2020-10-11T13:20:36Z")

</div>

not as many workers will be created as requested