# What steps should the Julia community take to bring Julia to the next level of popularity?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/what-steps-should-the-julia-community-take-to-bring-julia-to-the-next-level-of-popularity/101389>\
**Category:** Community\
**Created:** [July 9, 2023, 9:59am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/what-steps-should-the-julia-community-take-to-bring-julia-to-the-next-level-of-popularity/101389 "2023-07-09T09:59:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 23

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mihalybaci](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/mihalybaci/32/13528_2.png) [@mihalybaci](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/mihalybaci)\
**Post date:** [July 10, 2023, 2:52pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/what-steps-should-the-julia-community-take-to-bring-julia-to-the-next-level-of-popularity/101389/23 "2023-07-10T14:52:32Z")

</div>

I’m definitely on the side of delaying Julia 2.0 as long as possible and haven’t really seen many issues worthy of issuing a breaking release. However, in light of the new [threading PSA](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/psa-thread-local-state-is-no-longer-recommended-common-misconceptions-about-threadid-and-nthreads/101274/40), is updating/deprecating the threading foot-guns a strong reason to push for 2.0? Or can any relevant problems be solved by non-breaking releases (or just encouraging better code)?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/what-steps-should-the-julia-community-take-to-bring-julia-to-the-next-level-of-popularity/101389)._
