# What Python Creator Guido van Rossum Thinks of Rust, Go, Julia, and TypeScript

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/what-python-creator-guido-van-rossum-thinks-of-rust-go-julia-and-typescript/61689>\
**Category:** Offtopic\
**Created:** [May 23, 2021, 6:02pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/what-python-creator-guido-van-rossum-thinks-of-rust-go-julia-and-typescript/61689 "2021-05-23T18:02:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![paulmelis](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/paulmelis/32/35063_2.png) [@paulmelis](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/paulmelis)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2021, 8:43am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/what-python-creator-guido-van-rossum-thinks-of-rust-go-julia-and-typescript/61689/14 "2021-05-24T08:43:39Z")

</div>

> [@jules](#):
>
> More functional than object oriented: Yes we don’t use classes and inheritance, but that doesn’t limit what you can build. It’s not like general software applications have to be written in OO style. If someone has never programmed anything worthwhile with multiple dispatch and makes sweeping comments about the lack of OO, I can’t really take that seriously as the differences in applied scenarios are much more nuanced than it appears at first.

Regarding this point, I have struggled myself not with the lack of OO in Julia, but by a lack of a good overview and description of alternatives that allow one to gradually move from an OO style to more “native Julia” style, while still maintaining performance and relative code simplicity. Since an OO approach is not very relevant when working in Julia you’re left a bit in the dark when moving from another OO language, like C++ or Python, to Julia as for the former there’s an enormous amount of material available online on OO techniques. The book “Design Patterns and Best Practices with Julia” that @Tamas_Papp recommended to me in a different thread does give a nice overview of approaches and is definitely recommended, but 1) you have to know about its existence and contents and 2) subsequently purchase it (I did). It also doesn’t really go into real-world performance issues, but stays fairly theoretical with toy examples (which arguably from a didactic standpoint makes sense).

The discussions on this forum on alternatives to OO in Julia show, at least to me, that they usually involve a much deeper understanding of Julia and use of more complex features to get good performance. The thread below is a really nice example and interesting discussion of OP and a second user later in the thread try to port some fairly simple and straightforward C++ code to Julia and initially running into issues with respect to performance (getting rid of allocations). But gradually the thread turns to discussing possible code structures on how to practically mimic things like dynamic dispatch, especially when the number of classes grows:

> [@Disabling allocations](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/disabling-allocations/51028/27):
>
> I think I am not the only one who proposes the “single dispatch” problem. Of course, one can use NameTuple and FunctionWrapper to mimic a method table just like those in C++ (actually I have tried a prototype of it, but I finally gave up for complexity). The problem here is that we try to eliminate dynamic dispatch, since dynamic dispatch is inefficient and allocates memory, whereas single dispatch in C++ and other languages also happens at runtime but the cost of single dispatch is much smalle…

Things suggested in the thread are union splitting, macros for field inheritance, `eval` to generate a set of functors, `GC.@preserve` and `FunctionWrappers.jl`. And this is just for porting a simple C++ hierarchy. While in contrast doing this kind of OO in C++ is easy by writing your class hierarchy and (virtual) methods per class and you get good performance and a straightforward code structure, without having to use any advanced features. And you only need to worry about performance of dynamic dispatch in a few pathological cases in C++, otherwise it just works fine. You can argue that OO as a _modeling_ tool is not as good or flexible as multiple-dispatch, but I’m not convinced yet that in Julia an alternative is available with the same performance _when coupled with similar code simplicity_. It seems you just need to work a lot harder in Julia, while leading to more complex code.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/what-python-creator-guido-van-rossum-thinks-of-rust-go-julia-and-typescript/61689)._