# What don't you like about Julia for "serious work"?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/what-dont-you-like-about-julia-for-serious-work/54591>\
**Category:** Community\
**Created:** [February 4, 2021, 5:49am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/what-dont-you-like-about-julia-for-serious-work/54591 "2021-02-04T05:49:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 170

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DOT](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/dc4da7/32.png) [@DOT](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/DOT)\
**Post date:** [May 11, 2023, 10:47am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/what-dont-you-like-about-julia-for-serious-work/54591/170 "2023-05-11T10:47:55Z")

</div>

What are the odds of adding mandatory declaring of variables before use to the Julia syntax in v2.0? 🙂

Or is there a way to find a typo in a variable- or field name in any other way than having 100% code coverage in the tests?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/what-dont-you-like-about-julia-for-serious-work/54591)._