# Updates to the site guidelines, especially regarding gen-AI

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/updates-to-the-site-guidelines-especially-regarding-gen-ai/134315>\
**Category:** Meta Discussion\
**Created:** [December 2, 2025, 10:58pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/updates-to-the-site-guidelines-especially-regarding-gen-ai/134315 "2025-12-02T22:58:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 29

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gwr](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/gwr/32/33632_2.png) [@gwr](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/gwr)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2026, 1:23pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/updates-to-the-site-guidelines-especially-regarding-gen-ai/134315/29 "2026-09-11T13:23:04Z")

</div>

> [@mbauman](#):
>
> But having better messaging on the flags and resulting canned moderation direct messages should help, I would think.

That might indeed go into the right direction. I would simply suggest to a) appeal to refrain from AI use in direct communication with people (e.g., more or less “chatting” or “talking” with each other), b) make clearer content quality related guidelines not simply (do not use a certain tool), and c) clearly offer the poster a chance to _heal_ the post.

What about that?

EDIT: A more technical solution would be “transcribed video messages” so there can be no doubt; might even be a market for such a tool. 😉

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/updates-to-the-site-guidelines-especially-regarding-gen-ai/134315)._