# Updated micro benchmark plot

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/updated-micro-benchmark-plot/68631>\
**Category:** Performance\
**Created:** [September 23, 2021, 1:12pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/updated-micro-benchmark-plot/68631 "2021-09-23T13:12:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![grasph](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/grasph/32/25684_2.png) [@grasph](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/grasph)\
**Post date:** [September 23, 2021, 1:12pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/updated-micro-benchmark-plot/68631/1 "2021-09-23T13:12:58Z")

</div>

Hello,

On [Julia Micro-Benchmarks](https://julialang.org/benchmarks/) it’s written the numbers for Julia in the shown micro-benchmark plot were obtained with Julia version 1.0.0.

Is there an update of the plot and do we expect newer Julia versions to perform even better?

Philippe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Oscar\_Smith](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/oscar_smith/32/25343_2.png) [@Oscar\_Smith](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Oscar_Smith)\
**Post date:** [September 23, 2021, 4:46pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/updated-micro-benchmark-plot/68631/2 "2021-09-23T16:46:12Z")

</div>

My guess is that not much will have changed on the Julia end. That said, we definitely should re-run.