# "Unsatisfiable requirements" when local packages use local packages (fixed in v1.4)

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/unsatisfiable-requirements-when-local-packages-use-local-packages-fixed-in-v1-4/36807>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Tags:** packages\
**Created:** [March 31, 2020, 5:59pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/unsatisfiable-requirements-when-local-packages-use-local-packages-fixed-in-v1-4/36807 "2020-03-31T17:59:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tuckermcclure](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/tuckermcclure/32/1187_2.png) [@tuckermcclure](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/tuckermcclure)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2020, 1:00am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/unsatisfiable-requirements-when-local-packages-use-local-packages-fixed-in-v1-4/36807/6 "2020-04-03T01:00:05Z")

</div>

This thread mentions a broader set of the problems experienced here: [Could we make first-class support for packages that are "just files" and not repositories?](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/could-we-make-first-class-support-for-local-unregistered-packages/36931)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/unsatisfiable-requirements-when-local-packages-use-local-packages-fixed-in-v1-4/36807)._