# Topological sort (performance)

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/topological-sort-performance/17153>\
**Category:** Performance\
**Tags:** sort\
**Created:** [November 5, 2018, 4:27am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/topological-sort-performance/17153 "2018-11-05T04:27:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 39

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kristoffer.carlsson](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/kristoffer.carlsson/32/22_2.png) [@kristoffer.carlsson](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/kristoffer.carlsson)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2018, 3:29pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/topological-sort-performance/17153/39 "2018-11-08T15:29:17Z")

</div>

> [@StefanKarpinski](#):
>
> Julia seems to have gotten about [4x faster on master](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/topological-sort-performance/17153/29), so probably it is now about 4x faster than Python on the Pythonic version of the algorithm.

That was from the timing in [Performance problem of count? - #13 by Sukera](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/performance-problem-of-count/16873/13) which was linked from [Topological sort (performance) - #18 by Liso](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/topological-sort-performance/17153/18).

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/topological-sort-performance/17153)._
