Sure, it gives freedom. But if you are reading someone else code it means you have to learn all the possible ways. And it may lead to unexpected inconsistencies. Some examples. Use the new package manager (using Pkg): pkg> add DataFrames julia> pkg"add DataFrames" julia> Pkg.add("DataFrames"…

Thinking about the issue in general, I am not sure that avoiding multiple ways to do the same specific thing is a viable design principle for a language with a rich type system, (informal) interfaces tied to generic functions, and multiple dispatch. For example, think about z = 1:3 map(x -> x + 1,…

Too many ways to do the same thing in Julia

General Usage

jonathanBieler August 24, 2018, 9:18am 7

This one seems like a bug to be honest (or maybe it’s a compatibility thing).

Topic		Replies	Views
Introduce ++ as the concatenation operator Internals & Design	60	4459	April 17, 2020
What's the meaning of the array syntax , ; New to Julia	17	9396	January 3, 2017
Julia included in Oreilly's "Emerging Programming Languages" report (June 2019) Community	52	3248	June 26, 2019
Question about the design of the language New to Julia	2	384	August 29, 2021
Any significant difference between string, *, and interpolation for concatenation? New to Julia	6	772	September 21, 2020

Too many ways to do the same thing in Julia

Related topics