EDIT: @rssdev1 it’s obvious, in hindsight, that your test code had 1/4 (for 15 sec.) change of failing! Nothing to do with memory/GC or the new option, which is great! And thanks for fixing the test code now in the PR. What might be happening in stable version of Julia (or with (or without) this ne…

Timing 1.9 WAS (mistaken): Hang on 1.6.6, 1.7.0, julia-1.8.0-beta3 and 1.9

jebej July 4, 2022, 6:41pm 5

Did you see the reply in the issue you created? The problem is that subtracting only the Dates.second part of two timestamps can lead to negative numbers.

1 Like

Topic		Replies	Views
Benchmarks game Performance	20	3906	May 13, 2020
Multithreaded memory usage General Usage	19	1825	July 14, 2023
How-to debug intermittent memory corruption errors (segfaults during GC) in large codebases General Usage question	16	1588	March 30, 2019
Memory allocations are not very understandable Performance	26	2030	December 12, 2017
Julia vs Microsoft's (Rust-inspired) Verona language and e.g. snmalloc allocator Offtopic	13	3646	May 9, 2020

Timing 1.9 WAS (mistaken): Hang on 1.6.6, 1.7.0, julia-1.8.0-beta3 and 1.9

Related topics