Hi, First and foremost, thank you for all the hard work on this great set of repositories. While browsing a few of them on GitHub, I noticed some commits attributed to Claude. This raised a couple of questions: How is Claude being used, and how useful has it been? How does this affect the licens…

So it’s pretty public that for about a month now I’ve had 32 processes setup on one of the 64 core 128gb RAM servers to just ssh in, tmux to a window, and tell it to slam on some things non-stop. And it has been really successful!.. with the right definition of success. Let me explain. [image] j…

Thanks for such a detailed reply, very interesting!

For what that’s worth, there are also some generated PRs, or PRs where a model is presumably a contributor, on the JuliaLang/julia repo: Pull requests · JuliaLang/julia · GitHub Pull requests · JuliaLang/julia · GitHub

Thank you for this excellent, detailed description of the value of LLMs & how to use them properly. They can be very useful to do lots of boring, crappy stuff you don’t really want to do and by avoiding you accumulate technical debt. Sure you have to review everything they do but it’s still saves 8…

Thanks for this overview – it’s very useful for others thinking about how they might use these tools. One thing that strikes me is that it can very easily become a hammer for all sorts of small problems which could be solved more efficiently. With ExplicitImports, it should be possible to at least m…

[image] frankier: One thing that strikes me is that it can very easily become a hammer for all sorts of small problems which could be solved more efficiently. I think that AI and explicit tools work very well together. It creates a closed feedback loop, where AI can iterate until linters stop…

To be a bit clearer, there are some errors which a linter can fix itself using only simple rules, similar to how automated code formatters like gofmt and black work. I agree that it’s a rather reliable use case for an LLM when it’s chewing through simple error messages from a linter, but in some cas…

For this sort of task, I’m more a fan of using LLMs to write + test the code transformations, and so get a deterministic output from a non-deterministic system :slight_smile:

(Sorry for my English.) I’ve been experimenting with Codex, Gemini CLI, and Claude (chat version) to generate prototypes of scientific applications. Here are my main observations: Full app generation (“vibe coding”) Using Codex, I built a droplet shape analysis app that calculates surface tensio…

After Chris closed out one of my issues with Claude, I realized I have been doing simple things the hard way for too long. Trying out Claude Code with Sonet 4.5 and it seems to work well enough with Julia. Now, I didn’t ask it to do anything particularly complicated, but it correctly implemented OAu…

The use of Claude Code in SciML repos

Tooling

Eben60 December 5, 2025, 12:52pm 21

YMMV - as I am on AI Pro plan, and just learned* Antigravity quotas do depend on your Google plan.

presumably because it was just introduced

Policies around registering AI-created packages in General?

Topic		Replies	Views
Reliability of AI coding tools Offtopic llm	31	700	November 19, 2025
Julia code generation LLM models? General Usage question	4	484	August 30, 2025
Are there efforts to improve ChatGPT for Julia code? Tooling	26	4155	July 24, 2023
JuliaLang/julia is AI slop now and I am heartbroken Community	29	1117	March 29, 2026
Vibe coding vs agentic coding (Ralph Wiggum loop) Offtopic	9	774	February 3, 2026

The use of Claude Code in SciML repos

Related topics