# The role of femtolisp in Julia?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/the-role-of-femtolisp-in-julia/1902>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** question, history\
**Created:** [February 4, 2017, 12:46pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/the-role-of-femtolisp-in-julia/1902 "2017-02-04T12:46:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jeff.bezanson](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/jeff.bezanson/32/48_2.png) [@jeff.bezanson](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/jeff.bezanson)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2022, 8:25pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/the-role-of-femtolisp-in-julia/1902/54 "2022-07-11T20:25:44Z")

</div>

> [@dennis-t-peasant](#):
>
> _Not_ LLVM bitcode, the superior FL bytecode

🕶

> [@dennis-t-peasant](#):
>
> If you remove FemtoLisp, I’m just going to put it back in via FFI.

👍 Yes, that is absolutely the way to do it. Nobody wants to banish femtolisp, just make it optional 😄

This all sounds like a really fun project. Best of luck.

[Previous page](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/the-role-of-femtolisp-in-julia/1902.md?page=2)
