# The impact of different ways of passing parameters on the speed of function computation

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/the-impact-of-different-ways-of-passing-parameters-on-the-speed-of-function-computation/118340>\
**Category:** New to Julia\
**Tags:** question\
**Created:** [August 18, 2024, 4:46pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/the-impact-of-different-ways-of-passing-parameters-on-the-speed-of-function-computation/118340 "2024-08-18T16:46:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DNF](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/dnf/32/10191_2.png) [@DNF](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/DNF)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2024, 8:07am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/the-impact-of-different-ways-of-passing-parameters-on-the-speed-of-function-computation/118340/12 "2024-08-20T08:07:01Z")

</div>

Hm, not sure. Did you include the entire output? It looks like something was cut off at the end.

But it also looks like it is indeed getting constant propagated. Do the two numbers at the end,

```julia
double 7465...
double -60049...

```

agree with the numerical output from the funtion?

(BTW, it’s much more convenient if you copy and paste the text rather than posting a screenshot. See: [Please read: make it easier to help you](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/please-read-make-it-easier-to-help-you/14757))

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/the-impact-of-different-ways-of-passing-parameters-on-the-speed-of-function-computation/118340)._