# Taking Fitting Seriously

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/taking-fitting-seriously/13281>\
**Category:** Data\
**Tags:** plotting\
**Created:** [August 12, 2018, 8:50am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/taking-fitting-seriously/13281 "2018-08-12T08:50:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 40

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ValdarT](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/valdart/32/24146_2.png) [@ValdarT](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/ValdarT)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2018, 9:58am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/taking-fitting-seriously/13281/40 "2018-12-08T09:58:28Z")

</div>

This (not too lively) discussion is related so I’ll link this here to draw more attention to it: [Machine Learning Toolset Improvement](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/machine-learning-toolset-improvement/4835).

I hope you don’t find this annoying; I just feel that it would benefit the Julia ecosystem quite a bit and it doesn’t seem to require a lot of work but it does seem to require some general consensus how to go about it.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/taking-fitting-seriously/13281)._