# SVD 2x slower than in Matlab and how to get best performance on Windows10

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/svd-2x-slower-than-in-matlab-and-how-to-get-best-performance-on-windows10/21645>\
**Category:** Performance\
**Created:** [March 8, 2019, 6:21pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/svd-2x-slower-than-in-matlab-and-how-to-get-best-performance-on-windows10/21645 "2019-03-08T18:21:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ufechner7](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/ufechner7/32/51363_2.png) [@ufechner7](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/ufechner7)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2024, 12:22pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/svd-2x-slower-than-in-matlab-and-how-to-get-best-performance-on-windows10/21645/22 "2024-10-09T12:22:04Z")

</div>

> [@F-YF](#):
>
> But that’s not why the time cost is slower than matlab, is it?

No, that is still unclear. So my current assumption would be that Matlab uses for SVD not the MKL routines, but some optimized code. Is this something we could also do for Julia?

[Previous page](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/svd-2x-slower-than-in-matlab-and-how-to-get-best-performance-on-windows10/21645.md?page=1)