# Rust / Julia Comparison Post

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/rust-julia-comparison-post/75403>\
**Category:** Performance\
**Tags:** rust\
**Created:** [January 29, 2022, 1:45am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/rust-julia-comparison-post/75403 "2022-01-29T01:45:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GunnarFarneback](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/gunnarfarneback/32/1827_2.png) [@GunnarFarneback](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/GunnarFarneback)\
**Post date:** [January 29, 2022, 4:03pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/rust-julia-comparison-post/75403/19 "2022-01-29T16:03:02Z")

</div>

> [@Vasily\_Pisarev](#):
>
> (This is a bugfix, rather) Concatenation instead of destructive extension of `words` : `allowed_guesses = [words; non_solution_words]` (4700 min → 150 min)

I think the real morale of the story is to extend the title of the blog post,

> Sometimes, rewriting in another language works

with

> …because you might not make the same bug in both implementations.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/rust-julia-comparison-post/75403)._