# Roadmap for small binaries

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/roadmap-for-small-binaries/99266>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** question\
**Created:** [May 23, 2023, 8:41am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/roadmap-for-small-binaries/99266 "2023-05-23T08:41:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 66

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jar1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c0e974/32.png) [@jar1](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/jar1)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2023, 9:57pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/roadmap-for-small-binaries/99266/66 "2023-10-22T21:57:41Z")

</div>

> [@Could Someone Explain To Me the Desire for Small Julia Binaries?](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/could-someone-explain-to-me-the-desire-for-small-julia-binaries/96484):
>
> Hi folks, I’ve seen this notion pop-up repeatedly about wanting small binaries created within the Julia ecosystem. I personally have been quite confused about this desire due to probably not working in a space where having small binaries is desired. My mental oversimplification of this problem is that as personal computer storage space has gotten so large, having big binaries is not a problem any more – as I see it. But I must be missing something crucial. Could anyone explain to me why we wa…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/roadmap-for-small-binaries/99266)._