# Roadmap for small binaries

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/roadmap-for-small-binaries/99266>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** question\
**Created:** [May 23, 2023, 8:41am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/roadmap-for-small-binaries/99266 "2023-05-23T08:41:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 106

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thautwarm](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/thautwarm/32/37760_2.png) [@thautwarm](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/thautwarm)\
**Post date:** [December 18, 2023, 8:10pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/roadmap-for-small-binaries/99266/106 "2023-12-18T20:10:13Z")

</div>

I’d like to share something interesting 🙂

 ![image](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/original/3X/0/3/0399ad37289b08b55e2428181fc8ce53184574ed.png)  
Recently, our AOT compiler (made by my team) has nearly achieved full support for type-stable Julia code, including exception handling, multiple dispatch and arbitrary complex constant data.

Something interesting is that our generated native code greatly outperforms vanilla Julia in terms of try-catch-finally statements, while in general cases our AOT Julia is slightly slower than the vanilla.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/roadmap-for-small-binaries/99266)._