# \[RFC\] GenderInference.jl

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/rfc-genderinference-jl/22294>\
**Category:** Data\
**Tags:** diversity\
**Created:** [March 25, 2019, 9:49am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/rfc-genderinference-jl/22294 "2019-03-25T09:49:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 31

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kevbonham](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/kevbonham/32/216165_2.png) [@kevbonham](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/kevbonham)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2019, 12:06am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/rfc-genderinference-jl/22294/31 "2019-03-28T00:06:01Z")

</div>

> [@dellison](#):
>
> Here’s a brief article on this specific use case from an HCI researcher who I admire: [https://ironholds.org/names-gender/](https://ironholds.org/names-gender/) I find their arguments very convincing,

Thanks for sharing! Definitely a useful perspective to keep in mind, though I don’t entirely agree.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/rfc-genderinference-jl/22294)._