# Questions related to -0.0 and 0.0

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/questions-related-to-0-0-and-0-0/70158
**Category:** General Usage
**Tags:** question
**Created:** [October 21, 2021, 2:55pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/questions-related-to-0-0-and-0-0/70158 "2021-10-21T14:55:11Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Oscar\_Smith](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/oscar_smith/32/25343_2.png) [@Oscar\_Smith](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Oscar_Smith)
#### Post date: [October 21, 2021, 2:56pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/questions-related-to-0-0-and-0-0/70158/2 "2021-10-21T14:56:41Z")

</div>

See [Is this a bug of the Julia function "unique"? - #30 by giordano](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-this-a-bug-of-the-julia-function-unique/70141/30) The next patch release of 1.6, and 1.7.0 will both fix this.

TLDR is that `unique` currently and incorrectly uses `==` instead of `isequal`

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/questions-related-to-0-0-and-0-0/70158)._