I do not understand the result in the second case julia> exp(2π/3 * 1im) -0.4999999999999998 + 0.8660254037844387im julia> exp(2π/3im) -0.4999999999999998 - 0.8660254037844387im julia> cis(2π/3) -0.4999999999999998 + 0.8660254037844387im Why there is a minus sign for the imag part ? :thinking:

This has nothing to do with exp, but with what you’re passing as argument: julia> 2π/3im 0.0 - 2.0943951023931953im julia> 2π/3 * im 0.0 + 2.0943951023931953im juxtaposition has higher precedence than /, 2π/3im is (2 * π) / (3 * im), not (2 * π / 3) * im. My perhaps controversial suggestion is t…

That is exactly the reason why I never do 2x. Yes, I know it looks neat and there are many topics discussing this and I know that the core julia devs like/love this feature and defend it, but I make enough confusion in my code on my own, don’t need help from outside :smiley:

Fair enough, being consistent is key.

Would it be a good idea to make the precendence of implicit multiplication lower than most explicit operators? That should be more intuitive. E.g. 1/2e would be 1/(2e) instead of (1/2)e? I’m not sure of the implementation difficulty though.

Isn’t the whole point of this thread that 1/2e is 1/(2e)?

Realisticly yes, that’s very true. I still have some hope that maybe a certain major version would allow breaking changes, somehow still supporting old code, although chances are extremely slim. Even that post is from 6 years ago… It’s a bit sad.

Question about `exp` with imaginary argument

General Usage

Sevi April 21, 2026, 7:27am 8

As others have mentioned, it’s debatable whether the current behavior of juxtaposition was a good choice or not. But even if most people were to agree that a different behavior would be better, it would break a lot of existing code. So realistically, it’s not going to be changed.

This is an older post, sir, but it checks out:

Topic		Replies	Views
Weird behavior in Complex Numbers New to Julia complex-numbers	4	563	March 16, 2019
Strange inconsistent in complex algebra General Usage	46	2600	August 5, 2020
Exponential matrix calculation with the exp() function vs procedure with the use of the eigen() function New to Julia question , linearalgebra	7	7845	October 22, 2020
Exponentiation in Julia New to Julia question , math	3	837	May 27, 2020
Weird result in power operator New to Julia	13	3178	June 6, 2020

Question about `exp` with imaginary argument

Related topics