# PSA: Julia is not at that stage of development anymore

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/psa-julia-is-not-at-that-stage-of-development-anymore/44872>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** psa\
**Created:** [August 13, 2020, 1:13pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/psa-julia-is-not-at-that-stage-of-development-anymore/44872 "2020-08-13T13:13:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![StefanKarpinski](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/stefankarpinski/32/24_2.png) [@StefanKarpinski](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/StefanKarpinski)\
**Post date:** [August 13, 2020, 1:53pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/psa-julia-is-not-at-that-stage-of-development-anymore/44872/4 "2020-08-13T13:53:20Z")

</div>

I have locked this thread because it is not everyone’s chance to bring up their favorite speculative language feature, it is a PSA that is meant to be linked to when people want to propose features that are not appropriate for Julia’s current stage of development.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/psa-julia-is-not-at-that-stage-of-development-anymore/44872)._