# \[Pre-ANN\] JuliaPackageComparisons

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/pre-ann-juliapackagecomparisons/103567>\
**Category:** Community\
**Created:** [September 6, 2023, 11:16am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/pre-ann-juliapackagecomparisons/103567 "2023-09-06T11:16:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gdalle](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/gdalle/32/27854_2.png) [@gdalle](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/gdalle)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2023, 7:38am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/pre-ann-juliapackagecomparisons/103567/5 "2023-09-07T07:38:29Z")

</div>

In case it’s any inspiration, I recently did that work with the graphs ecosystem. Will try to contribute it to your repo when I find the time

> [@The graphs ecosystem](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/the-graphs-ecosystem/99463):
>
> Hey everyone, The very fruitful discussion on [fixing package fragmentation](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-package-fragmentation/98712) started from a remark I made on Slack about graphs, which is why I’m asking the community for ideas and support. In my opinion, the most important things we can do (by order of priority) are: List existing packages to allow comparison Redesign the core interface to make it more usable Ensure reliability of the main packages for the long term What follows is a brief summary of each item, but feel free to suggest more!…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/pre-ann-juliapackagecomparisons/103567)._