# PPL collaboration

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ppl-collaboration/26145
**Category:** Probabilistic Programming
**Created:** [July 8, 2019, 5:27pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ppl-collaboration/26145 "2019-07-08T17:27:24Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 32

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Albert\_Zevelev](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/albert_zevelev/32/11844_2.png) [@Albert\_Zevelev](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Albert_Zevelev)
#### Post date: [April 7, 2020, 4:06am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ppl-collaboration/26145/32 "2020-04-07T04:06:50Z")

</div>

I’m really glad you’re having a discussion about PPL collaboration.  
I am a strong proponent of [making it easier](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-can-we-create-a-leaner-ecosystem-for-julia/32904) for Julia developers to collaborate.  
@trappmartin I think what you have in mind is essentially a “[Task Views](https://cran.r-project.org/web/views/)” for PPL in Julia.  
These things: 1 help discovery of relevant packages & 2 facilitate collaboration.

For example: @PetrKryslUCSD made a nice outline of [packages for PDEs in Julia](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/juliapde-survey-of-pde-packages/35672).

PS: MLJ may serve as an interface to the different PPL packages.  
The [MLJ Roadmap](https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/MLJ.jl/blob/master/ROADMAP.md) lists as a rough priority, integrating: [Turing](https://github.com/TuringLang/Turing.jl), [Gen](https://github.com/probcomp/Gen), [SOSS](https://github.com/cscherrer/Soss.jl).  
I hope that becomes a reality…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ppl-collaboration/26145)._