# Poll: Do we Julians want ANOVAs?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/poll-do-we-julians-want-anovas/3757>\
**Category:** Statistics\
**Created:** [May 17, 2017, 12:07am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/poll-do-we-julians-want-anovas/3757 "2017-05-17T00:07:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LewisHein](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/lewishein/32/5690_2.png) [@LewisHein](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/LewisHein)\
**Post date:** [May 17, 2017, 12:07am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/poll-do-we-julians-want-anovas/3757/1 "2017-05-17T00:07:52Z")

</div>

Hi everyone,

I’m a scientist on a crusade. My crusade is to bring a really good ANOVA system to julia, probably by merging [https://github.com/JuliaStats/GLM.jl/pull/70](https://github.com/JuliaStats/GLM.jl/pull/70).

I want to do this because Julia is awesome and I depend on it almost exclusively from everything from signal processing to basic stats. It works better than just about anything else. However, I believe that Julia could be made so much more awesome if we had a quick, easy, and julian ANOVA test available. What do you think?

_Poll ([view on site](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/poll-do-we-julians-want-anovas/3757/1))_

I will even go so far as to stick my neck out and say that I am willing to get my hands “dirty” coding if necessary to make this ANOVA dream a reality.

Lewis

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/poll-do-we-julians-want-anovas/3757)._