# Policies around registering AI-created packages in General?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/policies-around-registering-ai-created-packages-in-general/136228>\
**Category:** Tooling\
**Tags:** package, registry, ai\
**Created:** [March 16, 2026, 4:25pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/policies-around-registering-ai-created-packages-in-general/136228 "2026-03-16T16:25:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 69

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![goerz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/goerz/32/3269_2.png) [@goerz](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/goerz)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2026, 5:09pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/policies-around-registering-ai-created-packages-in-general/136228/69 "2026-03-17T17:09:31Z")

</div>

> [@langestefan](#):
>
> Why is the Julia registry so different from pypi in this regard?

Community consensus. Or, strictly speaking, registry-maintainer consensus. I’d again point to the older thread about [Background: General is moderately but not totally permissive](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/should-general-have-a-guideline-or-rule-preventing-registration-of-vibe-coded-packages/133205#p-620571-background-general-is-moderately-but-not-totally-permissive-1)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/policies-around-registering-ai-created-packages-in-general/136228)._