# Policies around registering AI-created packages in General?

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/policies-around-registering-ai-created-packages-in-general/136228
**Category:** Tooling
**Tags:** package, registry, ai
**Created:** [March 16, 2026, 4:25pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/policies-around-registering-ai-created-packages-in-general/136228 "2026-03-16T16:25:33Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 60

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![goerz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/goerz/32/3269_2.png) [@goerz](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/goerz)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 4:53pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/policies-around-registering-ai-created-packages-in-general/136228/60 "2026-03-17T16:53:31Z")

</div>

> [@kahliburke](#):
>
> Have you tried [Tachikoma.jl](https://juliaregistries.github.io/General/packages/redirect_to_repo/Tachikoma)?

Just to be extra clear, again: I’m not seeing any issues with the [Tachikoma.jl](https://juliaregistries.github.io/General/packages/redirect_to_repo/Tachikoma) package from which this discussion spun off. You definitely seem to have sufficient experience to use the agent-workflow effectively. So: more power to you!

There’s absolutely no issue with LLM-_assisted_ coding. It’s great when it can make people more productive, and I also agree that when used correctly, it has great potential to _improve_ the quality of packages. For Tachikoma in particular, that seems to be the case.

What we’re trying to protect against at the ecosystem level is huge quantities of low-effort code swamping the registry.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/policies-around-registering-ai-created-packages-in-general/136228)._