# Please suggest improvements to the JuMP documentation

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/please-suggest-improvements-to-the-jump-documentation/55596>\
**Category:** Optimization (Mathematical)\
**Created:** [February 19, 2021, 2:24am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/please-suggest-improvements-to-the-jump-documentation/55596 "2021-02-19T02:24:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mike\_k](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/mike_k/32/211864_2.png) [@mike\_k](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/mike_k)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2021, 5:28pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/please-suggest-improvements-to-the-jump-documentation/55596/5 "2021-03-09T17:28:06Z")

</div>

A “performance tips” section would be great. At least I remember an [old post](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/jump-cplex-adding-objective-function-expression-in-loop-is-very-resource-consuming/21859) of my beginner mistakes which possibly could have been avoided with such a section. Also an old [question](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/jump-0-18-summing-up-elements-of-solution-vector-allocates-memory/24488) regarding type annotations occupied me a while.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/please-suggest-improvements-to-the-jump-documentation/55596)._