Note: I think this could be solved by having the serialization / deserialization functions not save the hash table, just the pairs, and be smart enough to rehash the Dicts upon deserialization.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to `Base.hash`? | 14 | 1109 | April 11, 2022 | |
| Hashes change whenever package is pre-compiled | 12 | 720 | April 14, 2020 | |
| A question on hashes | 3 | 1608 | December 14, 2017 | |
| Why does the hash() method produce the same hash after a field value changes? | 9 | 635 | June 2, 2021 | |
| Persistent hash | 7 | 590 | May 22, 2024 |