# Performance of simple broadcasting operations with many arguments

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/performance-of-simple-broadcasting-operations-with-many-arguments/72213>\
**Category:** Performance\
**Tags:** performance, broadcast\
**Created:** [November 28, 2021, 9:55pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/performance-of-simple-broadcasting-operations-with-many-arguments/72213 "2021-11-28T21:55:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marco\_Lombardi](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/marco_lombardi/32/14608_2.png) [@Marco\_Lombardi](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Marco_Lombardi)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2021, 10:09pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/performance-of-simple-broadcasting-operations-with-many-arguments/72213/16 "2021-11-29T22:09:48Z")

</div>

Thank you, this really clarifies everything! And I do appreciate the speed simple broadcasting is generally able to reach at runtime, considering all the various possibilities. In reality, in same cases I have not even been able to fully match its speed with a for loop (as in [#71336](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/type-inference-for-recursive-broadcasting-operations/71336))…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/performance-of-simple-broadcasting-operations-with-many-arguments/72213)._