I have currently some code like this function printsim(simulator, nsample) for i = 1:nsample println(simulation(simulator)) end end As soon as each simulation is over, I print it to standard output, which I usually redirect to a file. In this way if the simulation is interrupted, …

[image] Any way to remove "From worker"? General Usage I want to print some data in a distributed for-loop but I don’t really want to see these lines with the “from worker” prefix. Is there any way to get rid of it? From worker 3: hello From worker 4: world …

Have you read the guide on parallel computing? The 3rd section “Multi-Core or Distributed Processing” should do what you want. https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1/manual/parallel-computing/index.html AFAIK, there are still issues with IO and multithreaiding, but it should be no problem with parallel…

So there wouldn’t any issue if I print to stdout in every worker process? The output will not be scrambled?

I did a bit experiments, it seems to be fine to print from multiple process, but the output is like this From worker 2: 154407.10809850367 617409.1958756159 3.4875938817358254e6 From worker 2: 153981.47053866184 601490.2774611807 3.262175496086296e6 Is there any way to get rid of this…

Parallelize simulations and print out results immediately when they are available

New to Julia

nilshg May 9, 2019, 8:59pm 5

Topic		Replies	Views
Parallel Postprocessing Julia at Scale parallel	10	932	October 5, 2019
Printing Diagnostic Info in Parallel Julia at Scale	1	519	November 27, 2020
Presence of println is affecting function behavior New to Julia question	10	347	November 18, 2024
Parallel computing: running from terminal vs. editor. Same code, missing parallelisation General Usage question , parallel	0	531	April 16, 2020
Parallel IO General Usage	6	1649	January 13, 2017

Parallelize simulations and print out results immediately when they are available

Related topics