# Package version purgatory
**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/package-version-purgatory/49246
**Category:** General Usage
**Created:** [October 29, 2020, 3:52pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/package-version-purgatory/49246 "2020-10-29T15:52:10Z")
**Posts on this page:** 6
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@grahamstark](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/grahamstark)
#### Post date: [October 29, 2020, 3:52pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/package-version-purgatory/49246/1 "2020-10-29T15:52:10Z")
Hi,
I published a package a while back, here:
> **[GitHub - grahamstark/PovertyAndInequalityMeasures.jl: A collection of...](https://github.com/grahamstark/PovertyAndInequalityMeasures.jl)**
>
> A collection of standard measures of poverty and inequality for microsimulation models. - GitHub - grahamstark/PovertyAndInequalityMeasures.jl: A collection of standard measures of poverty and ineq...
(it’s a slightly niche economics thing). All went well, and it’s in Julia’s package Registry at version 1.0, which is also the GitHub release version.
Later I make a small change, so I bumped the version to 1.0.1 and resubmited to the registry via Julia Hub. The registration is rejected because I forgot to put a version number for a dependency in Project.toml
So I fixed that, bumped the version to 1.0.2 and resubmited. That one was rejected because version 1.0.2 is non-consecutive with v1.0.0. (I think what I should have done here is resubmit keeping the version at 1.01).
I put the version back to 1.0.1, resubmiedt, but that was rejected because I’ve already submitted a version 1.0.1.
Can anyone suggest how I get out of this? Should I try submit in a different, lower level, way than through JuliaHub. I’m finding all this rather confusing …
Graham
---
### Author:  [@kristoffer.carlsson](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/kristoffer.carlsson)
#### Post date: [October 29, 2020, 4:06pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/package-version-purgatory/49246/2 "2020-10-29T16:06:31Z")
First, let me say that I do think all these strict version checks are pretty pointless. But anyway, I closed the 1.0.1 PR so I think it should work to register that one again now.
---
### Author:  [@grahamstark](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/grahamstark)
#### Post date: [October 29, 2020, 4:29pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/package-version-purgatory/49246/3 "2020-10-29T16:29:33Z")
Thanks! But when I resubmit I get the message here:
[https://github.com/JuliaRegistries/General/pull/23851](https://github.com/JuliaRegistries/General/pull/23851)
the bot still thinks I’m at the non-consecutive version 1.0.2. Both project.toml and the git tag are back at 1.0.1, so I don’t see where than comes from. This is, again, submitting via JuliaHub.
Thanks very much for taking time to look at this.
---
### Author:  [@kristoffer.carlsson](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/kristoffer.carlsson)
#### Post date: [October 29, 2020, 4:33pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/package-version-purgatory/49246/4 "2020-10-29T16:33:05Z")
> [@grahamstark](#):
>
> This is, again, submitting via JuliaHub.
>
> Thanks very much for taking time to look at this.
Hm, maybe JuliaHub is doing something strange. I’ll look into it.
---
### Author:  [@kristoffer.carlsson](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/kristoffer.carlsson)
#### Post date: [October 29, 2020, 4:42pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/package-version-purgatory/49246/5 "2020-10-29T16:42:39Z")
Your v1.0.1 tag has v1.0.2 in the project file: [https://github.com/grahamstark/PovertyAndInequalityMeasures.jl/releases/tag/v1.0.1](https://github.com/grahamstark/PovertyAndInequalityMeasures.jl/releases/tag/v1.0.1). Perhaps you get git reference “master” instead. Or update the tag.
---
### Author:  [@grahamstark](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/grahamstark)
#### Post date: [October 29, 2020, 5:03pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/package-version-purgatory/49246/6 "2020-10-29T17:03:02Z")
Oh, er… actually, all my mistake… I had tagged the new version 1.01 instead of 1.0.1 Fixed that & it all went through. Sorry for wasting your time. Looks fine now.
many thanks
Graham