# Outdated / bogus CUDA.jl documentation at https://juliagpu.gitlab.io/CUDA.jl?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/outdated-bogus-cuda-jl-documentation-at-https-juliagpu-gitlab-io-cuda-jl/77515>\
**Category:** GPU\
**Tags:** gpu, cuda\
**Created:** [March 7, 2022, 3:01pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/outdated-bogus-cuda-jl-documentation-at-https-juliagpu-gitlab-io-cuda-jl/77515 "2022-03-07T15:01:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![complyue](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/complyue/32/33802_2.png) [@complyue](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/complyue)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2022, 3:01pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/outdated-bogus-cuda-jl-documentation-at-https-juliagpu-gitlab-io-cuda-jl/77515/1 "2022-03-07T15:01:19Z")

</div>

By [CUDA.jl - Google Search](https://www.google.com/search?q=CUDA.jl) , the first hit is the github repo, which is good, but the second hit is [https://juliagpu.gitlab.io/CUDA.jl](https://juliagpu.gitlab.io/CUDA.jl) , which seems outdated, compared to [https://cuda.juliagpu.org](https://cuda.juliagpu.org) . But the later doesn’t have a hit for the root entry in the first page of google result.

I suggest the admin should take [juliagpu.gitlab.io](http://juliagpu.gitlab.io) offline, or serve up-to-date documentation there. Currently it doesn’t even have a list of CUDA.jl versions to choose (which is a decent feature [cuda.juliagpu.org](http://cuda.juliagpu.org) offers correctly). No easy way to check how “up-to-date” the contents there is, but it’s obviously not up-to-date.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![maleadt](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/maleadt/32/10097_2.png) [@maleadt](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/maleadt)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2022, 3:13pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/outdated-bogus-cuda-jl-documentation-at-https-juliagpu-gitlab-io-cuda-jl/77515/2 "2022-03-07T15:13:49Z")

</div>

I thought I had removed those pages when migrating the documentation, but apparently not. Should be gone now. Thanks for the report.