# On the performance and design of BioSequences compared to the Seq language

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/on-the-performance-and-design-of-biosequences-compared-to-the-seq-language/33789>\
**Category:** Community\
**Created:** [January 25, 2020, 10:52pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/on-the-performance-and-design-of-biosequences-compared-to-the-seq-language/33789 "2020-01-25T22:52:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mason](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/mason/32/2423_2.png) [@Mason](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Mason)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2020, 10:52pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/on-the-performance-and-design-of-biosequences-compared-to-the-seq-language/33789/1 "2020-01-25T22:52:43Z")

</div>

A really nice blog post from some BioJulia people on the benchmarks from the Seq language. Despite the focused topic, I think it treads ground that’s relevant to wider julia community and was an all around great read.

[https://biojulia.net/post/seq-lang/](https://biojulia.net/post/seq-lang/)
