# Next version of Julia Pro and DataFrames

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/next-version-of-julia-pro-and-dataframes/9009>\
**Category:** New to Julia\
**Created:** [February 12, 2018, 9:46am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/next-version-of-julia-pro-and-dataframes/9009 "2018-02-12T09:46:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![buzaku](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/buzaku/32/3413_2.png) [@buzaku](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/buzaku)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2018, 9:46am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/next-version-of-julia-pro-and-dataframes/9009/1 "2018-02-12T09:46:35Z")

</div>

Faced with Issue similar to [this](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/methoderror-when-trying-to-follow-diffeq-tutorial/8996/4) but with [DataFrames] ([How to upgrade from DataFrames 0.10.1 to 0.11.3? - #7 by buzaku](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-to-upgrade-from-dataframes-0-10-1-to-0-11-3/8243/7)). Will the next Julia Pro include DataFrames 0.11?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nalimilan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/nalimilan/32/147_2.png) [@nalimilan](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/nalimilan)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2018, 9:17pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/next-version-of-julia-pro-and-dataframes/9009/2 "2018-02-12T21:17:56Z")

</div>

If by “next version” you mean 0.7 or 1.0, then probably yes, given that DataFrames 0.10 doesn’t support Julia 0.7.