# New website

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844
**Category:** Announcements
**Tags:** website
**Created:** [August 3, 2018, 2:10am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844 "2018-08-03T02:10:35Z")
**Posts on this page:** 17
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Roger-luo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/roger-luo/32/3399_2.png) [@Roger-luo](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Roger-luo)
#### Post date: [August 9, 2018, 8:23am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/63 "2018-08-09T08:23:19Z")

</div>

Added an issue here:

[https://github.com/JuliaQuantum/JuliaQuantum.github.io/issues/47](https://github.com/JuliaQuantum/JuliaQuantum.github.io/issues/47)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Roger-luo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/roger-luo/32/3399_2.png) [@Roger-luo](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Roger-luo)
#### Post date: [August 9, 2018, 8:28am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/64 "2018-08-09T08:28:59Z")

</div>

BTW, in the scientific domain, if you want to mention quantum computing, I don’t think QuantumOptics.jl is accurate. Issued here

[https://github.com/JuliaLang/www.julialang.org/issues/105](https://github.com/JuliaLang/www.julialang.org/issues/105)

And for machine learning, I think [Turing.jl](https://github.com/TuringLang/Turing.jl) should also be mentioned as some kind of Julian’s Stan (a classic lib in other languages).

I can make a PR for those if your guys like.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![NiclasMattsson](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/niclasmattsson/32/21988_2.png) [@NiclasMattsson](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/NiclasMattsson)
#### Post date: [August 10, 2018, 7:05am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/65 "2018-08-10T07:05:00Z")

</div>

> [@tk3369](#):
>
> Is technical computing a term understandable by general public? Not me at least.

I can’t say, but this isn’t the first time the term figures prominently in text written by Julians…

```plaintext
               _
   _ _ _(_)_ | A fresh approach to technical computing
  (_) | (_) (_) | Documentation: https://docs.julialang.org
   _ _ _| |_ __ _ | Type "?" for help, "]?" for Pkg help.
  | | | | | | |/ _` | |
  | | |_| | | | (_| | | Version 0.7.0 (2018-08-08 06:46 UTC)
 _/ |\ __'_|_|_|\__'_| | Official http://julialang.org/ release
|__/ | x86_64-w64-mingw32

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![lwabeke](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/lwabeke/32/4005_2.png) [@lwabeke](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/lwabeke)
#### Post date: [August 14, 2018, 7:59am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/66 "2018-08-14T07:59:56Z")

</div>

Hi

I like the site overall, but in the Julia Observer list, I’m missing the test status that was available in the old site’s package listing.  
Frequently when I’m looking for a package related to a topic, I searched the list for keywords and then looked at the very short description and the test status.  
While it doesn’t tell you how much is really tested, it does give a sense that if the package fails tests in the last 2 versions and the date was a year ago that the package is probably stale and abandoned. This was atleast a warning to use with caution and/or maybe search a bit more if there isn’t a more active and recent substitute even if they used slightly different wording in their descriptions.

Especially with all the breaking changes switching from 0.6 to 0.7 and later, I’m missing a proper feedback on when I can attempt switching my work code to 0.7. Currently the package listing page seems to indicate I should probably still wait with only 20% working.  
All of the datestamped changes to package test status also only seem to be on the left 0.6 column, no changes on the 0.7 column…?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![carlomontec](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/carlomontec/32/2011_2.png) [@carlomontec](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/carlomontec)
#### Post date: [August 14, 2018, 10:10pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/67 "2018-08-14T22:10:19Z")

</div>

Hi, I realized the version in Spanish has several typos and grammatical mistakes. Is there a way I can help with that? I am native speaker.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![dpsanders](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/dpsanders/32/3573_2.png) [@dpsanders](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/dpsanders)
#### Post date: [August 14, 2018, 11:30pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/68 "2018-08-14T23:30:11Z")

</div>

The version of what in Spanish? You just need to make a Pull Request to the relevant file.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![NaOH](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/naoh/32/5632_2.png) [@NaOH](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/NaOH)
#### Post date: [August 15, 2018, 9:45pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/69 "2018-08-15T21:45:18Z")

</div>

I guess you are talking about the 1.0 blog post. In that case you can edit with your corrections following this link:

- [https://github.com/JuliaLang/www.julialang.org/edit/master/blog/\_posts/2018-08-08-one-point-zero-es.md](https://github.com/JuliaLang/www.julialang.org/edit/master/blog/_posts/2018-08-08-one-point-zero-es.md)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ufechner7](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/ufechner7/32/51363_2.png) [@ufechner7](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/ufechner7)
#### Post date: [March 12, 2019, 10:26am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/70 "2019-03-12T10:26:15Z")

</div>

I have the impression that the Julia examples from the old website are gone. Is that correct? That’s a pity, if I show Julia to new people they want to see a piece of code to understand if it is easy to read.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ufechner7](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/ufechner7/32/51363_2.png) [@ufechner7](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/ufechner7)
#### Post date: [July 29, 2019, 10:58pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/71 "2019-07-29T22:58:51Z")

</div>

And now the website is only be displayed in mobile style… I think that is a bug… (I hope).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tamas\_Papp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/tamas_papp/32/25949_2.png) [@Tamas\_Papp](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Tamas_Papp)
#### Post date: [July 30, 2019, 4:53am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/72 "2019-07-30T04:53:45Z")

</div>

I don’t know what “mobile style” is, but the website works fine for me on a desktop.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![yakir12](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/yakir12/32/297_2.png) [@yakir12](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/yakir12)
#### Post date: [July 30, 2019, 9:55am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/73 "2019-07-30T09:55:55Z")

</div>

Can confirm that it looks good both in my laptop (normal wide screen) and mobile phone (vertical layout).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mbauman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/mbauman/32/31082_2.png) [@mbauman](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/mbauman)
#### Post date: [July 30, 2019, 2:46pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/74 "2019-07-30T14:46:46Z")

</div>

Yes, it dynamically reflows the layout several different ways depending upon your window width. Perhaps try making your window wider?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![lostella](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/lostella/32/356_2.png) [@lostella](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/lostella)
#### Post date: [July 30, 2019, 3:15pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/75 "2019-07-30T15:15:34Z")

</div>

I’ve noticed, however, a strange behavior on mobile for which I opened an issue: [https://github.com/JuliaLang/www.julialang.org/issues/409](https://github.com/JuliaLang/www.julialang.org/issues/409)

Can anyone reproduce?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![braamvandyk](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/braamvandyk/32/5086_2.png) [@braamvandyk](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/braamvandyk)
#### Post date: [August 1, 2019, 9:34am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/76 "2019-08-01T09:34:51Z")

</div>

I can reproduce on iOS 12.4, Safari, Firefox and Chrome.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![NiclasMattsson](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/niclasmattsson/32/21988_2.png) [@NiclasMattsson](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/NiclasMattsson)
#### Post date: [August 1, 2019, 1:46pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/77 "2019-08-01T13:46:50Z")

</div>

I’m pretty sure the problem is the width of the iframe that contains the Juliacon videos. Here’s a 20 second clip that uses the cool mobile browser emulation feature in desktop Chrome (“toggle device toolbar”) and Firefox (“responsive design mode”) to demonstrate the issue:

Sorry that it’s so blurry. I wanted to test imgur’s new video clip capability but apparently their reencoding is really aggressive.

EDIT: I reposted this to the Github issue opened by @lostella.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![trappmartin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/trappmartin/32/1165_2.png) [@trappmartin](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/trappmartin)
#### Post date: [August 10, 2019, 10:53am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/78 "2019-08-10T10:53:57Z")

</div>

Looks nice. Would it be possible to add the respective probabilistic programming languages (Turing, Soss, Gen) to the Machine Learning and the Data Science ecosystems?

They seem to be missing at the moment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![StefanKarpinski](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/stefankarpinski/32/24_2.png) [@StefanKarpinski](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/StefanKarpinski)
#### Post date: [August 10, 2019, 8:41pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844/79 "2019-08-10T20:41:44Z")

</div>

Please make a PR to add them. The website code is here:

[https://github.com/JuliaLang/www.julialang.org](https://github.com/JuliaLang/www.julialang.org)

[Previous page](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-website/12844.md?page=3)
