# New Julia LTS? Are many using the current (Julia 1.6) LTS?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-julia-lts-are-many-using-the-current-julia-1-6-lts/93919>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Created:** [February 2, 2023, 12:04pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-julia-lts-are-many-using-the-current-julia-1-6-lts/93919 "2023-02-02T12:04:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 65

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mbauman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/mbauman/32/31082_2.png) [@mbauman](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/mbauman)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2024, 5:33pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-julia-lts-are-many-using-the-current-julia-1-6-lts/93919/65 "2024-01-18T17:33:52Z")

</div>

> [@xiaoxi](#):
>
> Would it be possible to accelerate the release of Julia 1.11 by releasing it with only the `public` keyword as a new feature and delaying other features planned for Julia 1.11 to a later version?

No. This is _always_ a tension. See, e.g., what happened with [v1.6 and v1.7](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/what-are-the-current-plans-regarding-a-new-lts-julia-version/63501). And there are just as likely to be [other features](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/master/NEWS.md) that others think are more important (e.g., dynamic scopes or `Main.main` or annotated strings or using [nontoxic mushrooms](https://emojipedia.org/brown-mushroom) as identifiers).

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-julia-lts-are-many-using-the-current-julia-1-6-lts/93919)._
