# New Julia LTS? Are many using the current (Julia 1.6) LTS?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-julia-lts-are-many-using-the-current-julia-1-6-lts/93919>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Created:** [February 2, 2023, 12:04pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-julia-lts-are-many-using-the-current-julia-1-6-lts/93919 "2023-02-02T12:04:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 54

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Palli](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/palli/32/3380_2.png) [@Palli](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Palli)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2024, 3:03pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-julia-lts-are-many-using-the-current-julia-1-6-lts/93919/54 "2024-01-18T15:03:56Z")

</div>

I had a typo (now fixed), I meant “make packages for 1.11 which means disregarding **1.10** ”, meaning good packages for 1.11 use public (where applying) and by doing such disregard 1.10 users by default, or make work for themselves to support older releases too, that would be avoided if LTS has support for public.

Do you think “public” will actually not be used much in packages as opposed to Julia itself (since there it’s problematic to export)?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/new-julia-lts-are-many-using-the-current-julia-1-6-lts/93919)._