# MTK: updated documentation?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/mtk-updated-documentation/134937>\
**Category:** Modelling & Simulations\
**Created:** [January 7, 2026, 2:38pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/mtk-updated-documentation/134937 "2026-01-07T14:38:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 25

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![langestefan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/langestefan/32/207923_2.png) [@langestefan](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/langestefan)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2026, 1:01pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/mtk-updated-documentation/134937/25 "2026-01-23T13:01:49Z")

</div>

There have been some massive changes recently, and I applaud all the hard work being put into MTK and I’m sure it will pay off in the long term. I’m hoping this year v11 will stabilize so we can start building again.

What we need most now is a solid set of well tested and documented component libraries covering all the basics in every vertical: mechanical, electrical, thermal etc. There was a discussion about it here: [ModelingToolkit V11 Library Split and Licensing, Community Feedback Requested - #89 by isaacsas](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/modelingtoolkit-v11-library-split-and-licensing-community-feedback-requested/134396/89)

Perhaps @isaacsas could comment on that. I think many of us including me want to help build these libraries, but right now it’s not clear what it’s going to look like.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/mtk-updated-documentation/134937)._