# Making Revise the default?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/making-revise-the-default/103506>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** revise\
**Created:** [September 4, 2023, 12:27pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/making-revise-the-default/103506 "2023-09-04T12:27:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tim.holy](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/tim.holy/32/52_2.png) [@tim.holy](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/tim.holy)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2023, 7:09pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/making-revise-the-default/103506/18 "2023-09-04T19:09:24Z")

</div>

> [@GregVernon](#):
>
> The general recommendation I’ve seen for using Julia is to not add any packages to your base Julia installation, instead use projects if you need additional packages.

I certainly don’t advise that. I have a [substantial number of “developer” packages in my default environment](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/code-block-only-for-packagecompiler-and-not-for-revise/99870/5); project-specific packages (i.e., things that do certain computations, etc) go in the project.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/making-revise-the-default/103506)._
