# Lost in transition: the current state of the Julia ecosystem?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/lost-in-transition-the-current-state-of-the-julia-ecosystem/5515>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Created:** [August 22, 2017, 8:24pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/lost-in-transition-the-current-state-of-the-julia-ecosystem/5515 "2017-08-22T20:24:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![essenciary](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/essenciary/32/210469_2.png) [@essenciary](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/essenciary)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2017, 11:23pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/lost-in-transition-the-current-state-of-the-julia-ecosystem/5515/10 "2017-08-22T23:23:59Z")

</div>

Similarly, `Gumbo` itself is at v0.3.0 on Julia v0.6, despite the fact that [pkg.julialang.org](http://pkg.julialang.org) lists

```julia
Julia v0.5: 0.3.0 (7 months ago) / Tests pass. 
Julia v0.6: 0.4.0 (a month ago) / Tests pass.

```

How can this be possible on a brand new Julia v0.6 install?

```julia
julia> versioninfo()
Julia Version 0.6.0
Commit 903644385b (2017-06-19 13:05 UTC)
Platform Info:
  OS: macOS (x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0)
  CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6820HQ CPU @ 2.70GHz
  WORD_SIZE: 64
  BLAS: libopenblas (USE64BITINT DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY Haswell)
  LAPACK: libopenblas64_
  LIBM: libopenlibm
  LLVM: libLLVM-3.9.1 (ORCJIT, skylake)

```

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/lost-in-transition-the-current-state-of-the-julia-ecosystem/5515)._