### Author:  [@fengyang.wang](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/fengyang.wang)
#### Post date: [May 1, 2017, 12:01am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/link-to-julia-questions-on-stackoverflow/3357/21 "2017-05-01T00:01:06Z")
I think that it would be better to preserve the authorship of the SO question and make it more clear that it’s a xpost from SO at the top of the question.
---
### Author:  [@vchuravy](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/vchuravy)
#### Post date: [May 1, 2017, 1:22am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/link-to-julia-questions-on-stackoverflow/3357/22 "2017-05-01T01:22:57Z")
> [@dfdx](#):
>
> Currently, I set the service to re-post questions to the “Usage” category on this forum. Does it make sense to create a separate category? Are there better ideas how to distinguish topics created here and reposted from SO?
Please don’t post them into Usage, we might need a special category that is read only.
What worries me the most is that we will have the same question in two places (without the author actually knowing) and it will also split discussions.
> [@dfdx](#):
>
> StackOverflow returns HTML of a question. Discourse seems to process it correctly except for \ tag which is escaped. From discussions on forums, I suppose this tag can be whitelisted and be inserted correctly here. If it doesn’t break any other configs, can somebody from admins take a look at it?
Escaping `[code]` should be fine.
> [@fengyang.wang](#):
>
> I think that it would be better to preserve the authorship of the SO question and make it more clear that it’s a xpost from SO at the top of the question.
Definitely!
---
### Author:  [@mbauman](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/mbauman)
#### Post date: [May 1, 2017, 4:14am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/link-to-julia-questions-on-stackoverflow/3357/23 "2017-05-01T04:14:38Z")
I guess I don’t quite understand the point here.
I suppose I can understand the rationale if you view the Discourse board as more of a mailing list. In that perspective, then it’s a kind of megaphone, and getting SO notifications in your email inbox from that same megaphone makes a certain kind of sense.
But it’s not just a mailing list. It’s a live board all on its own. Kevin is just one of 54 members (out of 800+) to have _ever_ sent a reply via email. Very few members treat it as a mailing list. Having stale, read-only content isn’t really helpful on a live messaging board.
If you want email notifications for StackOverflow, you can sign up for them through the Stack Exchange network: [julia-lang - Stack Exchange](https://stackexchange.com/filters/39385/julia-lang?subscribe=yes-please) .
---
### Author:  [@kevin.squire](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/kevin.squire)
#### Post date: [May 1, 2017, 6:09am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/link-to-julia-questions-on-stackoverflow/3357/24 "2017-05-01T06:09:50Z")
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your perspective (really!). Rereading my original post, it does seem quite narrow (I was probably on my phone, in a hurry, and attempting to be terse). Let me add a few thoughts, and then ask if you have any particular followup.
Even given that most people don’t read this forum through email, wouldn’t it be useful to make this forum more of a one-stop shop and give more visibility to Julia questions posted on StackOverflow? StackOverflow isn’t going away any time soon, and many programmers who don’t use Julia much head there first when asking questions. While it doesn’t have the sense of community this Discourse forum has, in my opinion, active participation on StackOverflow is good PR for Julia. Beyond my own use case, pointing people there just from Discourse, to me, seems like it would make it more likely that those questions would be answered well, and might increase the set of people answering them.
Matt, do you (or anyone else) have further thoughts on why this wouldn’t be worthwhile? While I proposed this idea because I thought it was reasonable, I’m okay with it not happening it’s reasonably found to be not worth it, or even detrimental.
Cheers,
Kevin
---
### Author:  [@Tamas\_Papp](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Tamas_Papp)
#### Post date: [May 1, 2017, 7:22am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/link-to-julia-questions-on-stackoverflow/3357/25 "2017-05-01T07:22:58Z")
> [@kevin.squire](#):
>
> wouldn’t it be useful to make this forum more of a one-stop shop and give more visibility to Julia questions posted on StackOverflow?
I would prefer not to merge the two forums in any way, since it would increase the amount of information I have to cope with. I find that following and contributing to this forum (Discourse) is the sweet spot for me, and seeing questions from SO in addition would be too much.
---
### Author:  [@dfdx](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/dfdx)
#### Post date: [May 1, 2017, 9:51am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/link-to-julia-questions-on-stackoverflow/3357/26 "2017-05-01T09:51:00Z")
Sure, the format is still to be adjusted. Note, however, that I can only put the name of the SO user in the body of a topic, but the topic itself will be posted by API user anyway.
---
### Author:  [@dfdx](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/dfdx)
#### Post date: [May 1, 2017, 10:05am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/link-to-julia-questions-on-stackoverflow/3357/27 "2017-05-01T10:05:07Z")
> [@vchuravy](#):
>
> Please don’t post them into Usage, we might need a special category that is read only.
It would be perfect, but I can’t see any docs on read-only categories. Are they available from admin panel?
> [@vchuravy](#):
>
> What worries me the most is that we will have the same question in two places (without the author actually knowing) and it will also split discussions.
How about notifying SO user the first time his question is re-posted here?
A more general question: do we want to pull users from SO here or is it better to keep questions in 2 separate places? I can see the point of both approaches: a single place means a single centralized knowledge base which is always easier to work with, but at the same time StackOverflow is a good entry point for new users who only start exploring Julia and don’t know much about this forum.
---
### Author:  [@dfdx](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/dfdx)
#### Post date: [May 1, 2017, 10:18am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/link-to-julia-questions-on-stackoverflow/3357/28 "2017-05-01T10:18:40Z")
> [@Tamas\_Papp](#):
>
> I would prefer not to merge the two forums in any way, since it would increase the amount of information I have to cope with. I find that following and contributing to this forum (Discourse) is the sweet spot for me, and seeing questions from SO in addition would be too much.
What about making a “private” category that is only visible for users who have subscribed to SO questions? It’s like “watching” feature, but if you don’t explicitly opt in, new topics won’t appear neither on the “Unread”, nor on the “New” tab.
---
### Author:  [@mbauman](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/mbauman)
#### Post date: [May 1, 2017, 4:23pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/link-to-julia-questions-on-stackoverflow/3357/29 "2017-05-01T16:23:25Z")
From my perspective, I can see three primary objectives:
1. Provide direct help to the question-asker.
2. Create a public and searchable record of answers to help future question-askers find the solution before they ask it.
3. Foster a community of users
Mirroring questions to discourse might help improve #1 — maybe more folks will see questions. That said, though, the Julia questions on SO are doing a good job of finding answerers. There’s a 10% unanswered rate for the julia-lang tag; this compares very favorably against all the other tags I’ve looked at.
I don’t think it’d help #2. Edits won’t propagate, answers won’t show up, and I think Google docks SEO points for having exact mirroring.
And I don’t think it’d help #3. We don’t want to split the discussion, so we’re talking about it being read-only. And so then there wouldn’t be a place for discussion.
---
### Author:  [@djsegal](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/djsegal)
#### Post date: [June 15, 2017, 6:39pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/link-to-julia-questions-on-stackoverflow/3357/30 "2017-06-15T18:39:29Z")
Just a heads up, [Julia Observer](https://juliaobserver.com/) now shows the most recent Julia questions from Stack Overflow
---
### Author:  [@kevin.squire](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/kevin.squire)
#### Post date: [June 16, 2017, 3:39am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/link-to-julia-questions-on-stackoverflow/3357/31 "2017-06-16T03:39:40Z")
Thanks, @djsegal!
[Previous page](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/link-to-julia-questions-on-stackoverflow/3357.md?page=1)