# LightGraphs benchmark study, take 2

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/lightgraphs-benchmark-study-take-2/39297>\
**Category:** Graphs\
**Tags:** lightgraphs, benchmarks\
**Created:** [May 11, 2020, 4:52pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/lightgraphs-benchmark-study-take-2/39297 "2020-05-11T16:52:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pei](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/a698b9/32.png) [@Pei](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Pei)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2021, 10:07pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/lightgraphs-benchmark-study-take-2/39297/9 "2021-08-18T22:07:46Z")

</div>

Anyone tried to run the benchmarks? I am seeing some function usage inconsistencies between lightgraphs.jl in the benchmark and LightGraphs.jl , e.g., LightGraphs.ShortestPaths VS. LightGraphs.Experimental.ShortestPaths. I did some search and found the discussion ([LightGraphs users (and other interested parties): please opine below](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/lightgraphs-users-and-other-interested-parties-please-opine-below/37660)) about different ways to implement functions/modules in developing LightGraphs 2.0. But I could not find recent updates. Does anyone know what version of LightGraphs.jl I should use for the benchmark? Thanks.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/lightgraphs-benchmark-study-take-2/39297)._