# Keeping scientific objectivity and details in benchmark reports

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/keeping-scientific-objectivity-and-details-in-benchmark-reports/63579
**Category:** Community
**Tags:** question
**Created:** [June 25, 2021, 8:54pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/keeping-scientific-objectivity-and-details-in-benchmark-reports/63579 "2021-06-25T20:54:19Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 43

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![shahmoradi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c5a1d2/32.png) [@shahmoradi](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/shahmoradi)
#### Post date: [June 27, 2021, 3:54pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/keeping-scientific-objectivity-and-details-in-benchmark-reports/63579/43 "2021-06-27T15:54:05Z")

</div>

I cannot believe there are at least 16 people (presumably scientists) in this Julia forum who believe science is not necessarily quantifiable or reproducible. This mentality is a danger to science and scientific community. NIH and NSF are currently spending billions of dollars to make existing pseudo scientific reports reproducible.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/keeping-scientific-objectivity-and-details-in-benchmark-reports/63579)._