# Julia's loop scope behavior differs from Fortran?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julias-loop-scope-behavior-differs-from-fortran/50275>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Created:** [November 17, 2020, 6:55am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julias-loop-scope-behavior-differs-from-fortran/50275 "2020-11-17T06:55:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 21

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Benny](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/49beb7/32.png) [@Benny](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Benny)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2020, 2:35pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julias-loop-scope-behavior-differs-from-fortran/50275/21 "2020-11-17T14:35:56Z")

</div>

Exactly. Put simply, no edit to the manual will help if people don’t know how to look up sections, just like with real books. You can put flashing neon lights on the section and it wouldn’t help if the reader hasn’t reached the page.  
That’s not to say this can’t be improved ever. I just remembered [this topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-their-any-clear-documentation-that-outlines-what-and-does/50232) where it turned out typing `==` and `===` in the search bar didn’t return the right sections in Base or Manual.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julias-loop-scope-behavior-differs-from-fortran/50275)._
