# Julia vs C++ speed

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-vs-c-speed/67219>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Tags:** performance, c\
**Created:** [August 28, 2021, 2:24pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-vs-c-speed/67219 "2021-08-28T14:24:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Allan\_Baker](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/allan_baker/32/42645_2.png) [@Allan\_Baker](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Allan_Baker)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2021, 3:08pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-vs-c-speed/67219/22 "2021-09-02T15:08:46Z")

</div>

I didn’t see this in the discussion. But does the c++ wrapper induce additional overhead in the c++ numbers? Is that accounted for?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ronis\_BR](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/ronis_br/32/50999_2.png) [@Ronis\_BR](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Ronis_BR)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2021, 3:25pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-vs-c-speed/67219/23 "2021-09-02T15:25:46Z")

</div>

It has little overhead when translating the types. However, those numbers (execution time) were obtained using the C++ code directly.

[Previous page](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-vs-c-speed/67219.md?page=1)