# Julia v1.0.5 is now available

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-0-5-is-now-available/28752>\
**Category:** Announcements\
**Tags:** release\
**Created:** [September 14, 2019, 4:45am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-0-5-is-now-available/28752 "2019-09-14T04:45:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ararslan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/ararslan/32/3825_2.png) [@ararslan](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/ararslan)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2019, 4:45am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-0-5-is-now-available/28752/1 "2019-09-14T04:45:55Z")

</div>

Julia version 1.0.5, the fifth patch release for the 1.0 long-term support series of releases, is now available. You can get binaries for Linux (i686, x86-64, ARMv7, AArch64), FreeBSD (x86-64), macOS, and Windows (32-, 64-bit) at [Download Julia](https://julialang.org/downloads).

As a patch release, 1.0.5 contains no new features or breaking changes, only bug fixes and documentation improvements. You can see a summary of the changes in the [release notes](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/releases/tag/v1.0.5) and you can see a list of commits included since 1.0.4 [here](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/compare/v1.0.4...v1.0.5). We recommend anyone currently using 1.0.4 (or an earlier 1.0.x release) upgrade to 1.0.5.

Note that 1.0 on Travis, AppVeyor (with [Appveyor.jl](https://github.com/JuliaCI/Appveyor.jl)), and Cirrus (using [CirrusCI.jl](https://github.com/ararslan/CirrusCI.jl)) now refers to 1.0.5.

Enjoy!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![laborg](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/laborg/32/5474_2.png) [@laborg](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/laborg)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2019, 7:41am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-0-5-is-now-available/28752/2 "2019-09-14T07:41:27Z")

</div>

Great - Will the Snap be updated?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PetrKryslUCSD](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/petrkryslucsd/32/215825_2.png) [@PetrKryslUCSD](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/PetrKryslUCSD)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2019, 11:33am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-0-5-is-now-available/28752/3 "2019-09-14T11:33:34Z")

</div>

I’m afraid I need a reminder: how do these bug fixes and documentation improvements find their way into versions such as 1.4?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tero\_Frondelius](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/tero_frondelius/32/7629_2.png) [@Tero\_Frondelius](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Tero_Frondelius)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2019, 11:49am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-0-5-is-now-available/28752/4 "2019-09-14T11:49:49Z")

</div>

Very good and throughout explanation: [Julia's Release Process](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julias-release-process/28122)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PetrKryslUCSD](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/petrkryslucsd/32/215825_2.png) [@PetrKryslUCSD](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/PetrKryslUCSD)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2019, 11:51am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-0-5-is-now-available/28752/5 "2019-09-14T11:51:46Z")

</div>

Thanks for the link!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PetrKryslUCSD](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/petrkryslucsd/32/215825_2.png) [@PetrKryslUCSD](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/PetrKryslUCSD)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2019, 12:02pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-0-5-is-now-available/28752/6 "2019-09-14T12:02:03Z")

</div>

So if I understand [Julia's Release Process](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julias-release-process/28122), there is no harm in using the nightly instead of 1.0.5, because the bugs fixed in 1.0.5 are also fixed in the nightly?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamas\_Papp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/tamas_papp/32/25949_2.png) [@Tamas\_Papp](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Tamas_Papp)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2019, 12:44pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-0-5-is-now-available/28752/7 "2019-09-14T12:44:51Z")

</div>

> [@PetrKryslUCSD](#):
>
> there is no harm in using the nightly instead of 1.0.5, because the bugs fixed in 1.0.5 are also fixed in the nightly?

Yes, but nightly may have some new bugs 😉

Choose between the latest stable release (1.2), or the 1.3 release candidates, or master, depending on your tolerance for bugs and willingness to investigate/report issues — see the [risk tolerance personas](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/proposed-release-process-and-schedule/15623) here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![viralbshah](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/viralbshah/32/54_2.png) [@viralbshah](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/viralbshah)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2019, 12:53pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-0-5-is-now-available/28752/8 "2019-09-14T12:53:57Z")

</div>

When a release is made, package evaluator is run to look for regressions, which may have crept in on the branch. Also the Julia binaries that are put up for distribution tend to be more carefully built than one’s own personal build.  
I would recommend staying with the tagged release, and preferably the distributed binaries where stability matters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PetrKryslUCSD](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/petrkryslucsd/32/215825_2.png) [@PetrKryslUCSD](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/PetrKryslUCSD)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2019, 12:56pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-0-5-is-now-available/28752/9 "2019-09-14T12:56:31Z")

</div>

Thank you for your response. My point was: Am I or am I not going to run into the bugs in the nightly that have been already fixed in 1.0.5 ( or some such patch release)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Oscar\_Smith](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/oscar_smith/32/25343_2.png) [@Oscar\_Smith](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Oscar_Smith)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2019, 4:22pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-0-5-is-now-available/28752/10 "2019-09-14T16:22:41Z")

</div>

You will not run into bugs patched on 1.0.5, but you might run into bugs that never were in 1.0.5

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PetrKryslUCSD](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/petrkryslucsd/32/215825_2.png) [@PetrKryslUCSD](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/PetrKryslUCSD)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2019, 4:28pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-0-5-is-now-available/28752/11 "2019-09-14T16:28:33Z")

</div>

That is understood. That is the reason why the developers ask people to use the nightly. 😉
