# Julia stats, data, ML: expanding usability

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-stats-data-ml-expanding-usability/67948
**Category:** Statistics
**Tags:** statistics
**Created:** [September 9, 2021, 5:02pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-stats-data-ml-expanding-usability/67948 "2021-09-09T17:02:31Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 38

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![dlakelan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/dlakelan/32/8491_2.png) [@dlakelan](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/dlakelan)
#### Post date: [September 11, 2021, 11:34pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-stats-data-ml-expanding-usability/67948/38 "2021-09-11T23:34:58Z")

</div>

I’d suggest that people don’t want to iterate on columns, OR rows, they want to iterate on _atomic observations_. That’s the level the API should be built at.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-stats-data-ml-expanding-usability/67948)._