# Julia slower than Python to sort and reverse a list of integers

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-slower-than-python-to-sort-and-reverse-a-list-of-integers/97453>\
**Category:** Performance\
**Created:** [April 13, 2023, 10:45pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-slower-than-python-to-sort-and-reverse-a-list-of-integers/97453 "2023-04-13T22:45:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adienes](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/adienes/32/37459_2.png) [@adienes](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/adienes)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2023, 4:42am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-slower-than-python-to-sort-and-reverse-a-list-of-integers/97453/41 "2023-04-28T04:42:38Z")

</div>

I think one should remember, in any language, that calling print statements in a loop can and will hurt performance. If anything this just makes me think the `@time` macro should also mark out IO time

[Previous page](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-slower-than-python-to-sort-and-reverse-a-list-of-integers/97453.md?page=2)